Submitted by editor on Wed, 14/03/2018 - 11:06
http://www.arre.co.in/pov/plagiarism-plagiarism-steve-jobs-zuckerberg-shakespeare-simpsons-originality/

The origins of this proverb are unknown, but they are relevant in varied contexts. One can say that the concept of plagiarism efficiently sits on this axiom. But there's another saying too; "If you steal ideas from one source that's plagiarism, but ideas stolen from more than one source makes the output a 'research.'" So, which one of these two proverbs should we apply when talking about plagiarism? Will it be literary theft? Or will it be fair to use? No doubt, the rules of plagiarism are vague. Although the subject falls under the umbrella of Intellectual Property (the IP), IP law does not directly prohibit the same.

The two main branches of IP law deal with copyright and industrial property. Patents and trademarks fall under the later, and copyrights deal with the right of authorship. Strictly speaking, plagiarism cannot fall under the two types of IP. While plagiarism protects ideas, copyright law does not protect intangible expressions or idea. There are many ways of defining plagiarism.

To read the whole article please see the link below:
http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?article_id=673348&signup=true